🔗 Share this article

During last year's presidential campaign, the former president courted voters with promises to lower prices starting on day one. However, after he assumed office, there was minimal focus to affordability issues. All that changed after price-fatigued citizens delivered a rebuke at the polls. Shortly thereafter, the Trump administration launched a hastily assembled effort to tackle living costs. Unfortunately, this initiative is a hot mess—characterized by absurdity, inconsistencies, magical thinking, scapegoating, and Trumpian dishonesty.

Out-of-Touch Assertions and Grocery Store Reality

Merely 48 hours after the election, Trump began his affordability drive with a disastrous remark: “Food prices are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” This comment from the wealthy leader—often mingles with fellow billionaires—demonstrated utter contempt for everyday citizens who struggle every time they go the grocery store. In effect, he ignored their concerns as trivial, suggesting they were mistaken about price levels.

His assertion about declining prices proved absurdly obtuse and inaccurate. In what way could all costs be falling when the taxes he imposed were increasing prices? Official statistics indicate banana prices rose 6.9% in the last twelve months, beef prices went up almost 15%, and coffee prices surged by nearly 19%—partly due to import taxes applied to Brazilian products. In the first three quarters, prices rose in five of the six food categories monitored by the government’s price index, including animal proteins (up 4.5%), non-alcoholic beverages (increasing nearly 3%), and produce (rising slightly).

Inconsistencies and Inaccuracies in Economic Statements

In spite of the evidence, the president persists in repeating his misleading narrative about affordability. After the vote, he has claimed there is “almost no price increases,” insisted “costs have fallen significantly,” and argued “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under sleepy Joe Biden.” Such remarks contradict the fact that prices overall have unarguably risen after the previous administration. At present, inflation is running at a 3% annual rate, that’s 50% higher than the Federal Reserve’s 2% goal. In another falsehood, he claimed that gas prices had fallen to around two dollars, even though official data show they average $3.19.

Faced with actual conditions and lower approval ratings, advisers apparently cautioned that his “costs are falling” message portrayed him as dangerously out of touch from ordinary people. Many citizens are angry about rising costs following assurances of decreases. As a result, advisers suggested one quick fix: roll back some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. This sensible idea contradicted Trump’s absurd assertion that new tariffs wouldn’t raise prices for American shoppers.

Suggested Fixes and Their Potential Impact

With certain taxes reduced on several food items, the administration will likely claim that he has cut prices once those foods begin to fall in price. This would be like an arsonist boasting for putting out a fire that he ignited. On another occasion, while speaking McDonald’s executives, Trump stated that “we are in the golden age of America” and told the audience that “costs are decreasing and all of that stuff.” Such statements are easy for a billionaire to make, but they ring hollow to countless households facing hardships—especially when millions risk losing food stamps or skyrocketing health premiums.

According to a recent poll from October, 74% of Americans believe the state of the economy are fair or poor, while just a quarter rate them positive. Another poll found that a majority of citizens feel the administration’s actions have “made the economy worse” in the country.

Financial Truth and Proposed Steps

The treasury secretary, Trump’s chief financial officer, recently contradicted assertions of a prosperous era. He noted that far from booming, certain sectors of the US economy “have contracted.” The manufacturing sector—which Trump vowed to save—appears to have contracted for eight months in a row and lost approximately tens of thousands of positions this year. Pointing to these challenges, Bessent called on the central bank to reduce borrowing costs—a move that could ease financial pressure.

In response to public dismay about living costs, Trump suggested a cash handout of “a dividend of at least $2,000 a person” not for “high income people.” For many households in need, this sounds like manna from heaven, but the prospects are dim that Congress—concerned about large shortfalls—will approve the proposal. This idea would likely raise government expenditure, push up borrowing costs, and potentially drive prices higher by injecting cash into consumers’ pockets.

A further supposed fix for cost issues involved introducing 50-year mortgages, based on the idea that they could lower housing costs. But, the truth is that such lengthy loans would do little to reduce installments—frequently cutting them by a small amount per month. The drawback is that these mortgages could significantly increase the overall cost borrowers pay and slow building home value.

Blaming the Past Government and Economic Prospects

As part of their cost-cutting effort, the administration have again blamed Biden for economic problems, including increasing costs. Spokespeople claimed they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “addressing the prior administration’s price hikes.” This is absurd and inaccurate allegations. In reality, the former president left a strong economy, with low price growth, solid expansion, and minimal joblessness. However, Trump’s policies—especially import taxes—have created an economic mess, pushing up prices and slowing GDP growth.

Per Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, 22 states are experiencing economic decline, with their economies damaged by the administration’s trade policies. He fears that if large states like major economies tumble into recession, the US could face a broad economic slump. In downturns, consumers generally possess less money to spend, and inflation usually declines. Unfortunately, given Trump’s much-ballyhooed affordability campaign probably ineffective to control costs, his most effective “tool” for improving living standards might prove to be triggering an economic contraction—something that hard-pressed households really can’t afford.